Art
As part of my research for my trip to Rome, I’ve been reading up on the art in the Vatican. Not to be a philistine, and remember I am uneducated in artworks, but it seems to me that the people depicted are quite well-fed (looking a little flabby with extra pounds around the waists here and there.)
Of course, this wouldn’t be all that obvious if they wore clothes. What is up with that? Over half the pictures I’ve seen depict completely naked people–sort of implying that in that day and age, clothes were not popular. When the people in the images are wearing clothes they seem to be half draped in clothing (body parts…leak out here and there–a boob here, a missing fig leaf there.)
I’m not complaining about the quality of the art, mind you, I’m just noticing. Makes me wonder if they are trying to depict what was considered normal/beautiful for the time or if because the scenes often depict a holy image of some sort if the nakedness is meant to portray us in all our…glory? Hmm.
At any rate, I’m sure the pictures (like most things) are better seen in person. Most of the ones in the books I’m reading are black and white and that tends to make them a confusing picture of crowds of people. It’s hard to tell what any of them are supposed to be doing, even when you’re familiar with things like the story of Moses and the Flood and the Last Judgment and so on.
I am learning quite a bit and I’m looking forward to seeing the real things.
