I’m going to do a couple of writing posts on what I like about book agents and what I don’t. No, this won’t be a personal post about any agent, just an overall list of things I’ve noticed about agents and their websites.
I’ll start with things that I really like about agents, and then later this week I’ll post about things that make me sigh big-time. There may even be a few things that I list that will cause me not to query an agent! For those of you that already have an agent, feel free to chime in and list what made your agent an attractive candidate!
1. I love agents who blog. Why? I can get to know the agent, there’s generally an opportunity to ask questions and watch how the agent interacts with clients and potential clients. You can get an idea if the agent takes the blog seriously, how that agent feels about various genres and various books. I also like the fact that an agent can use the blog to publicize books. I don’t care if the agent blogs about non-publishing topics; that often keeps things interesting, but if the blog is not meant to be used for agenting purposes at all, it should be stated somewhere so as not to confuse. I certainly enjoy “business” posts mixed with movie reviews, links to interesting articles, etc. The personality of the agent comes through on a blog as does the professionalism. Even a blog post of once a week is great.
2. I love agents that have a page on their agency website that not only lists their clients, but has pictures of the client’s book covers. Yes, another opportunity to market the book. I would have to say that the vast majority of agents let these lists falter–or they post one cover, or the latest covers, rather than all titles available. (A lot of them miss the latest book cover–so the first in a series shows up, but the next two don’t–missed opportunity–the reader might be interested!)
Do I read books based on what I found on an agent site? Absolutely. If I come across an agent, I’d like to know what the rep’d books are about. A nice cover shot and a back blurb tell me a lot about the book and the efforts of the agent or agency to promote said books. A link to author websites is nice as well. I don’t care if there is an author picture, but it doesn’t hurt.
3. I would like more agents to talk about about foreign sales, audio rights and e-book rights. There’s one agent I can think of that mentions foreign sales frequently. It’s helpful to know which agencies are successful and active selling foreign rights, audio rights–and it also tells me whether a book is out in audio or e-book (if I want to check out an agent via something that agent reps, I’m much more likely to check out an e-book because I can download it instantly.)
4. Queries accepted via email or form. Most agents do take queries this way. There are a few that don’t. If I know of the agent, I’m still likely to submit there, but I generally won’t submit without having a good reason to do so (the agent reps several books that I love, the agent reps an author I have actually spoken with, I’ve met the agent, etc.) If the agent simply doesn’t bother with an email because that agent is so well-known and successful that he/she doesn’t need to accept email queries, I likely won’t bother. Not because I’m lazy, but because that agent isn’t likely to be looking all that hard for new clients.
5. Reply time stated. I don’t bother to submit to agents that have a policy of “no reply means no.” (I don’t submit stories to magazines with that policy either.) I really, really prefer agents that get back to queries in a week to a month. Two months is okay as well. Three months? Not so great. The other key, of course, is that the agent actually reply close to the stated time. A week or so off is no big deal. But in my experience querying agents those that list a 3 month reply time tend to be the ones that don’t actually reply for six.
6. Do what your website says. If the website says email queries are accepted, don’t get caught at a conference saying you never read them via email or don’t take them seriously. (Certainly don’t blog to that effect!) Don’t have one area of the website give the email address for queries and another place on the website mention that you don’t like email queries and that you really only accept them from academics (or lawyers or whatever). And go ahead and answer the email queries if you accept them. Form responses are okay and expected.
7. I really prefer agent sites that allow an author to submit to a single agent–rather than a single address that covers the entire agency.
8. It’s fine and helpful to blog about what you like from authors; there’s a fine line crossing over into complaining about the endless work, the horrible queries and worst of all–taking shots or making fun of bad queries/stupid questions/etc. Very few agents can pull off “funny” without it turning into “making fun of” and most of the time, it turns into a lynch mob in the comments anyway.
Having or not having the above doesn’t necessarily mean it is a show-stopper. They are merely preferences in the search for an agent. Anyone else have anything to add?
Update: Before I could even write the things I don’t like about agents, a couple of very good agents asked! There is a great discussion going on over at the Bookends Blog. Check it out–great list of writer pet-peeves! For the most part, it sounds like authors just want to be treated with respect and dealt with in a timely manner. I’m really glad that Jessica Faust (the head of the Bookends agency) took out the comments that “named” agents. It’s not a blacklist; it’s meant to be an exercise to help agents, not lynch them!!!!