It’s the Season
Except for the occasional blog post discussing why, as a writer, I don’t want to talk about politics, I don’t blog about politics. Why? Because I’m a reader. I was a reader before I was a writer. This means I read author blogs. I generally go there for the entertainment value. Some blogs are interactive enough that I go there for the conversation. I check a few now and then to find out about new releases–the ones that are most valuable in this sense discuss books other than the author’s books. Why? Because I’m a reader and no single author puts out books fast enough that I am going to need to visit very often if the only books talked about are the author’s releases.
I complained earlier about authors that blog about politics (and any blog that isn’t generally a political one turning rogue). I already talked about how it alienates me on several levels. But here’s the bullet point reason I hope I never make the same mistake as an author:
As a reader, when I see political articles on an author blog, I cease to send readers there. I don’t know the political persuasion of everyone–I don’t want to insult or make anyone uncomfortable by sending a reader to an author site that harps, even occasionally, on politics or specific political issues. This doesn’t mean I go back and delete previous links to interesting articles, but if a conversation comes up on a blog and I’d generally say, “Oh, you should read so-and-so’s blog” … I don’t say it. This happened to me two days ago. An author I read almost daily has put up two or three political posts in the last month. One was particularly…passionate and on a sensitive issue. During a recent blog discussion, his books would have been perfect recommendations, but I kept my mouth shut. Didn’t mention the author or the blog. Just didn’t want to go there.
If the political flaming on a blog is bad enough or frequent enough–I stop reading the blog altogether. I may delete previous links that I had to the blog because I don’t wish to send people looking for book news and entertainment to Politics Rants and Raves by mistake.
If I love the books, I usually keep reading them…but. I’ll be perfectly honest here. I might buy them. But I might not. I might not read them at all or I might put it off. It’s not really punishment of the author that is intended. It’s avoidance of an aura/atmosphere that made me uncomfortable. I now associate the book/author with a vague uncomfortable feeling. It’s almost identical to the feeling when I finish a book that I liked…but…maybe didn’t end the way I hoped. If it’s by a favorite author, I’m going to read the next one…just not right away. Maybe it’ll be in the library, and I’ll pick it up there if I’m in the mood. I’ll get it later, rather than sooner.
If I don’t love the books, guess what? Yup. That vague uncomfortable feeling turns into: I don’t read the book at all. This generally doesn’t happen on a completely conscious level. I realized it happened to me two weeks ago when in a book discussion online someone said to me, “Oooh, you read so-and-so. Have your read X or Y?” Except…I hadn’t read so-and-so for some time. In fact, as I thought about it, I had stopped reading so-and-so’s blog because he harped on political issues. The books I had read were good, perhaps nothing I would have searched out, but something I would have read had I come across them. The blog by the author was often humorous. But after a few too many political posts that probably started…6 months to a year ago I stopped reading the blog. Granted the author tried to be funny with his politics–but it wasn’t very clever. The jests were all about one party or one candidate. They were often mixed into what started as a perfectly innocent movie discusion. End result? I still can’t be bothered to read the book or the blog.
I’m not alone in this feeling either, although many readers make the decision based on intellectual disagreement with the author’s political leanings. I’ve read enough forum posts to know, because this topic is often discussed.
I understand that people feel passionately about the issues. But I also understand that by blogging about these issues they are trying to sway me to their point of view or at the very least defend their position from on high. I read blogs to engage intellectually and emotionally in characters, plots, publishing news, books and author news. When I get an emotional or intellectual appeal on voting a particular issue or candidate, I feel more than cheated. I’m dismayed. Sometimes embarrassed. Any way you look at it, I don’t feel good. That feeling stays.
I recently read a blog that said something along the lines of: “Well as long as the political discussions are civil, it’s okay. These things can generate a lot of traffic and good discussion.” That made me smile because while those that spoke up and participated might have thought it was all okay and everyone left feeling good, I could have told him–that wasn’t the case. It may generate traffic–but it might also be diminishing traffic. Trust me on this.

















